美国是在为我们解放台湾提前“打个样儿”吗？或者说美国现任政府认为我们解放台湾的方式“太磨叽”干脆直接出手给我们提供了一个非常成功有效的“案例”或“范例”？这难道又是一次的天佑中华吗？
2026年的元旦节未过完的1月3日凌晨，美国侵略了委内瑞拉，并掠其总统及夫人。美国甚至“接管”了委内瑞拉，美国总统特朗普声称“管理”委内瑞拉直到实施“安全”过渡。美国是“成功“的；那对委内瑞拉来说则是屈辱的。抛开这些不说，美国的这种做法给我们带来的如下几点启示：
首先，快进快突、快打快冲锋，美国在军事方面实行定点轰炸，目的就是削弱或者消除委内瑞拉的还手能力；结果可以说是全面“落袋”。美军打击了委内瑞拉的军事反制能力，使得军事反击降为零，美军伤亡为零。
其次，让美国中央情报局的特工提前完成了对委内瑞拉的渗透，围攻委内瑞拉总统府时甚至得到了线人的“指引”，其中马杜罗的一名亲信掌握并跟踪了马杜罗的行踪，并实时提供给美方。美方完全掌握了委内瑞拉的情报信息。换句话说，美国提前对委内瑞拉完成了渗透，尤其是对委国内的一些政要完成了策反才能够对马杜罗总统的行踪了如指掌，提前为元旦节期间打击委内瑞拉垫下了一步坚实的基础。
第三，“擒贼先擒王”，把委内瑞拉总统及夫人公开掠走，造成委内瑞拉国内“群龙无首”的局面，意在震慑委内瑞拉上下，从而为下一步直接接管委内瑞拉铺平道路、扫清障碍，这也证明了美国的“成功”。
针对美国的这以上这几点，将来我们在解放台湾的时候，利用好并在我们固有的“十面埋伏”，“天下围攻”台岛的基础之上，采取美国的上述方式，对台独军事设施进行重点毁灭性的打击使得台独台军还不了手的同时，提前派驻工作小组进入岛内爱国分子进行保护，对中立分子进行策反，保证将爱国能量方面的损失降到最低。同时，要摸清台独分子尤其是其首要分子，诸如赖清德之流及民进党中的台独死硬分子之辈的这些活动规律，进行定点的狙杀或者逮捕、剪除等。美国一直喜欢做别人的“导师”，这一次是在对我们进行实战化和案例化的“教学”吗？
（以下是英文版The next is English edition）
Global Refuel Station Issue 20: Is the US "mentor" setting an example for us in advance of liberating Taiwan?
(Afternoon, Sunday, January 4, 2026)
In the early morning of January 3, 2026, before the New Year's Day holiday was over, the United States invaded Venezuela and kidnapped its President and his wife. The United States even "took over" Venezuela, with U.S. President Trump claiming to "manage" Venezuela until a "safe" transition was implemented. The United States was "successful"; for Venezuela, it was humiliating. Putting these aside, the following points of inspiration are brought to us by the United States' approach:
Firstly, the United States adopted a strategy of swift attack and rapid breakthrough, aiming to weaken or eliminate Venezuela's ability to retaliate through targeted bombing in the military field. The outcome can be described as a comprehensive "success". The US military struck at Venezuela's military countermeasures, reducing the military counterattack to zero and causing no casualties among the US troops.
Secondly, CIA agents were able to complete their infiltration of Venezuela ahead of schedule, and even received "guidance" from informants during the siege of the Venezuelan presidential palace. One of Maduro's close associates tracked Maduro's whereabouts and provided real-time information to the US side. The US had complete control over Venezuela's intelligence information. In other words, the US had completed its infiltration of Venezuela ahead of schedule, especially the persuasion of some Venezuelan political leaders, which allowed them to have a clear understanding of President Maduro's whereabouts and lay a solid foundation for the attack on Venezuela during the New Year's Day holiday.
Thirdly, "catch the king first when capturing the thief", by openly kidnapping the Venezuelan president and his wife, creating a situation where Venezuela is "leaderless", the intention is to intimidate the entire Venezuelan nation, thus paving the way and clearing the obstacles for the next step of directly taking over Venezuela. This also proves the "success" of the United States.
In response to the above points raised by the United States, when we liberate Taiwan in the future, we will leverage our inherent "ambush from all sides" and "surround and attack from all directions" strategy against Taiwan Island, and adopt the aforementioned methods of the United States to launch a devastating attack on Taiwan's independent military facilities, making it impossible for Taiwan's independent forces to retaliate. At the same time, we will send working groups into the island in advance to protect patriots, recruit neutral individuals, and ensure that the loss of patriotic energy is minimized. At the same time, we must find out the activity patterns of Taiwan independence elements, especially their leaders, such as Lai Ching-te and other die-hard Taiwan independence supporters in the Democratic Progressive Party, and carry out targeted assassinations, arrests, or removals. The United States has always enjoyed being a "mentor" to others. Is this time they are giving us practical and case-based "teaching"?
